Characterization of the patients with repairs of stomatological prosthesis

Authors

  • Isidro de Jesús Napoles Gonzalez
  • Ana María Nápoles Salas
  • Caridad Inés García Nápoles
  • Magalys Castellanos Zamora
  • Yordana Silva Martínez

Abstract

Background: for their function in the mouth, the type of material out of which is manufactured, the use and care on behalf of the patient, dental prostheses suffer breakings and deterioration very frequently that are solved in the clinic with repair.
Objective:
to characterize patients with repairs of stomatological prosthesis in Julio Antonio Mella clinic.
Methods:
an observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted from in 2015, in patients who were assisted in Julio Antonio Mella clinic. The universe was composed of 590 patients over 20 years old from both sexes, in search of attention for urgency of prosthesis with problems of their prosthetic appliance. The selection of the sample was non probabilistic and it was made up of 567 patients who presented urgency for repair of their prosthesis.
Results:
among the 567 patients females prevailed. The age groups that predominated were the ones from 40 to 59 years followed by the 60 to 79 years. From the total of individuals that requested urgencies for repair of prosthesis 319 people used removable partial denture and 248 total prostheses. The major reason for reappearances was due to the fall of teeth in partial dentures, followed by the total fractures with predominance in the full dentures.
Conclusions: the simple repairs were more abundant without notable difference between the full and the partial dentures. There was more incidence of fall of teeth in partial prostheses and complete fractures in the full dentures.
DeCS: DENTAL PROSTHESIS REPAIR; DENTAL PROSTHESIS/classification; ACRYLIC RESINS; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Álvarez Rivero A. Prótesis bucomaxilofacial. Procedimiento de laboratorio [Internet]. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2013 [citado 11 Ene 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.bvs.sld.cu/libros_texto/protesisbucomaxilofacial_procedimientos_asistenciales3raed/protesisbucomax_proc_asist_3raed_completo.pdf

2. Yagual Figueroa MJ. Restauración dentaria con prótesis parciales removibles mucosoportadas o acrílicas y dentomucosoportadas o metálicas [Internet]. Ecuador: Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad Piloto de Odontología; 2012 [citado 11 Ene 2016]. Disponible en: http://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/bitstream/redug/7396/1/YAGUALmaribel.pdf

3. Zeballos López L, Aliaga Alcón GM. Tolerancia biológica a los Biomateriales dentales. Rev de Actualización Clínica [Internet]. 2013 [citado 16 Feb 2015];30:[aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revistasbolivianas.org.bo/pdf/raci/v30/v30_a09.pdf

4. MaytaAli CR, Mendoza Alejo GA, Zeballos López L. Prótesis Removible de Resina. Rev Act Clin Med [Internet]. Sep 2012 [citado 16 Feb 2015];24:[aprox. 9 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revistasbolivianas.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2304-37682012000900007&lng=es

5. Torres Márquez PA, Fuentes González M de la C, Doce Rodríguez RV, Clavería Ríos FA, Torres López LB. Urgencias en un servicio de prótesis estomatológica. MEDISAN [Internet]. Oct 2011 [citado 16 Feb 2015];15(10):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1029-30192011001000008&lng=es

6. Romero Junquera CR, García Rodríguez B, Genicio Ortega S. Estado prostodóncico y salud bucal en pacientes que solicitaron reparaciones protésicas. CCM [Internet]. Mar 2015 [citado 9 Oct 2016];19(1):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1560-43812015000100005&lng=es

7. Ramos Lorenzo M, Menéndez Vázquez L, Mesa Levis D, Casanova C, Lemus Cruz LM, García Jordán M, et al. Manual de procedimientos para laboratorios de prótesis estomatológicas [Internet]. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2015 [citado 15 Feb 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.bvs.sld.cu/libros_texto/manual_proced_laboratorio_protesis/manual_protesis_completo.pdf

8. Saizar P. Prótesis a placa. 6ta ed. Cuba: Cooperativa del libro; 1970.

9. Rodríguez Borges L, Cidranes Blomelín M, Delgado González E. Experiencia de la consulta de urgencias en el servicio de prótesis estomatológica. Arch Méd Camagüey [Internet]. 1998 [citado 15 Oct 2016];2(1):[aprox. 12 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revistaamc.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/3736

10. Álvarez-Hernández E, Ferrer-García M, Franco-Bravo Z. Propuesta de un plegable de autoayuda para la higiene de la prótesis dental. Rev Cubana de Tecnología de la Salud [Internet]. 2014 [citado 15 Oct 2016];0(0):[aprox. 0 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revtecnologia.sld.cu/index.php/tec/article/view/298

11. Castañeda Casal L, Díaz Gómez SM, Pérez Cedrón RA. Estrategia educativa como instrumento preventivo de urgencias en pacientes rehabilitados con prótesis parcial removible metálica. Arch Méd Camagüey [Internet]. Abr 2010 [citado 16 Feb 2015];14(2):[aprox. 12 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1025-02552010000200010&lng=es

12. Chang Murias YS, LemesReitor E de la C, Toro García LM del. Caries dental en urgencias estomatológicas en el área del Policlínico René Vallejo. Bayamo. Multimed [Internet]. Jul-Sep 2013 [citado 16 Feb 2015];17(3):[aprox. 9 p.]. Disponible en:

http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/multimed/mul-2013/mul133k.pdf

Published

2017-05-23

How to Cite

1.
Napoles Gonzalez I de J, Nápoles Salas AM, García Nápoles CI, Castellanos Zamora M, Silva Martínez Y. Characterization of the patients with repairs of stomatological prosthesis. Arch méd Camagüey [Internet]. 2017 May 23 [cited 2025 Jul. 15];21(3):321-7. Available from: https://revistaamc.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/5034

Issue

Section

Original Articles