Mammary augmentation through prosthetic
Abstract
Introduction: Appearance, size, form and symmetry of the mammary gland play an important role in the sexuality of the woman and have a deep effect in her biopsychosocial well-being.
Objective: To characterize breast augmentation using prosthetic implants.
Methods: A descriptive, prospective longitudinal study was carried out to determine the behavior of breast augmentation through prosthetic implants in patients with breast disorders that attended to the consultation of Plastic Surgery of the Universitary Hospital Manuel Ascunce Domenech in Camagüey's province, from September, 2017 to June, 2020. 35 patients were studied and the following variableswere analyzed: age, breast disease to be corrected with implants, implant volume, access route for implant placement, location of the breast pocket and complications with the procedure.
Results: Of all the patients studied, mammary hypotrophy was present in 25 females, predominating in the ages between 30 and 49 years in 68.56% of them. In twelve of the patients who used the subareolar route for implant placement, they presented volumes between 351 and 400 milliliters. The least used access route for implant placement was the axillary route, in one patient and this in turn used a retromuscular breast pocket. Wound dehiscence was the predominant complication.
Conclusions: Breast augmentation surgery using alloplastic material is a frequent procedure that is used to correct different breast defects in the specialty of Plastic Surgery, with a variety of techniques and few complications.
DeCS: BREAST DISEASES; BREAST IMPLANTS/adverse effects; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; SELF CONCEPT.
Downloads
References
1. Santanelli di Pompeo F, Laporta R, Sorotos M, Di Napoli A, Giovagnoli MR, Cox MC, et al. Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: Proposal for a Monitoring Protocol. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet]. 2015 Ago [citado 12 Nov 2021];136(2):144e-151e. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26218387/.
2. Jiménez Boraita R, Arriscado Alsina D, Dalmau Torres JM, Gargallo Ibort E. Determinantes de la satisfacción corporal en adolescentes de la Rioja. Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]. 2021 Jun [citado 29 Nov 2021];95(1):1-12. Disponible en: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/biblioPublic/publicaciones/recursos_propios/resp/revista_cdrom/VOL95/O_BREVES/RS95C_202106077.pdf
3. Kalaaji A, Dreyer S, Brinkmann J, Maric I, Nordahl C, Olafsen K. Quality of Life After Breast Enlargement With Implants Versus Augmentation Mastopexy: A Comparative Study. Aesthet Surg J [Internet]. 2018 Nov [citado 02 Ene 2022];38(12):1304-15. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29481590/.
4. López Madurga S. Funciones y cuidados perioperatorios de enfermería en la cirugía de aumento de mamas. Revista Electrónica de Portales Medicos.com [Internet]. 2020 [citado 01 Ene 2022];XV(15). Disponible en: https://www.revista-portalesmedicos.com/revista-medica/funciones-y-cuidados-perioperatorios-de-enfermeria-en-la-cirugia-de-aumento-de-mamas/.
5. Berrocal-Revueltas M. Mastopexia con prótesis: técnica triplanar con
colgajo en cola de pez para mamas con pobre calidad de cobertura. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2013 Oct-Dic [citado 19 Nov 2021];39(4). Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922013000400005
6. Fernández-Palma C. Mamoplastia de aumento: abordaje fisioterapéutico. Revista Científica Arbitrada en Investigaciones de la Salud GESTAR [Internet]. 2018 [citado 12 Nov 2021];1(1): 2-9. Disponible en: https://journalgestar.org/index.php/gestar/article/view/9
7. Mantuano Reina YM, Gaibor Tapia AL, Vélez Bravo MD, Orozco Freire IC. Abordaje areolar vs submamario en la mamoplastia de aumento. Recimundo [Internet]. 2021 Ene [citado 19 Nov 2021];5(1):184-190. Disponible en: https://recimundo.com/index.php/es/article/view/997
8. Coombs DM, Grover R, Prassinos A, Gurunluoglu R. Breast augmentation surgery: Clinical considerations. Cleve Clin J Med [Internet]. 2019 [citado 10 Dic 2021];86(2):111-12. Disponible en: https://www.ccjm.org/content/86/2/111
9. Oller I, Cansado MP, Ruiz-Tovar J, Zubiaga del TL, Arroyo A, Calpena R. Resultados de un programa de seguimiento de las prótesis mamarias PIP (poly-implant-prothese). Rev Chil Cir [Internet]. 2015 Jun [citado 10 Dic 2021];67(3). Disponible en: https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-40262015000300004
10. Bellini Ditta L. Ptosis mamaria y su resolución quirúrgica. Rev Argent Cir Plást [Internet]. 2018 [citado 19 Dic 2021];24(2):95-104. Disponible en: http://adm.meducatium.com.ar/contenido/articulos/16800950104_1176/pdf/16800950104.pdf
11. Ventura OD. Secuencia quirúrgica en mastopexia de aumento con
implantes. Importancia de un abordaje neutro y multimodal. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2017 Ene-Mar [citado 10 Dic 2021];43(1). Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922017000100002
12. Cervilla Lozano JM. Ventajas del implante graso autólogo sobre el
implante aloplástico en la mama tuberosa. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2020 Jul-Sep [citado 19 Dic 2021];46(3). Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922020000400003
13. Di Pietro CN. Mama tuberosa: clasificación y alternativas quirúrgicas en los últimos años. Rev Argent Cirug Plást [Internet]. 2018 Abr-Jun [citado 19 Dic 2021];24(2):88-94. Disponible en: http://adm.meducatium.com.ar/contenido/articulos/16800880094_1175/pdf/16800880094.pdf
14. Austin RE, Saheb-Al-Zamani M, Lista F, Ahmad J. Periareolar Augmentation-Mastopexy. Aesthetic Surg J [Internet]. 2019 [citado 19 Dic 2021];39(9):953-65. Disponible en: https://www.theplasticsurgeryclinic.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Austin-et-al.PDF.pdf
15. Expósito Jalturin A, Escobar Vega H, Tamayo Carbón AM, González Bello JS. Mastoplastia de aumento por vía axilar sin endoscopio. Acta médica [Internet]. 2021 [citado 19 Dic 2021];22(3). Disponible en: http://www.revactamedica.sld.cu/index.php/act/article/view/191
16. Colombo C, Flores Z. Revisión a 5 años de técnicas quirúrgicas y características de los implantes en 2876 mamoplastias de aumento consecutives. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2015 Jul-Sep [citado 19 Dic 2021];41(3). Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922015000300003
17. Rincón Rubio LL, Cemborain Valarino M, Jiménez Cárdenas AC, Gutiérrez Barrozo KU. Sistematización de la mastopexia con implantes: técnica reglada. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2020 Oct-Dic [citado 19 Dic 2021];46(4). Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922020000500003
18. Tamayo Carbón AM, Manrique Trujillo AF, Guardo Varela CA, Cuastumal Figueroa DK. Caracterización de las pacientes con contractura capsular operadas de mastoplastia de aumento con implante. Acta médica [Internet]. 2020 [citado 09 Ene 2022];21(3). Disponible en: http://www.revactamedica.sld.cu/index.php/act/article/view/102/pdf
19. Mantilla JC. Complicaciones en cirugías mamarias. MÉD UIS [Internet]. 2018 [citado 09 Ene 2022];31(3):63-5. Disponible en: https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistamedicasuis/article/view/9234/9531
20. Moretti E, Falzone SM, Cifuentes X, Ospina M, Peláez JM, Cortadi P, et al. Incidencia, tratamientos y resolución quirúrgica en fístulas por implantes mamarios. Soc Boliv Cirug Plást [Internet]. 2021 [citado 09 Ene 2022];2(8). Disponible en: https://uai.edu.ar/media/118641/ganadores-2021-moretti-incidencia-tratamientos-y-resoluci%C3%B3n-quir%C3%BArgica-en-f%C3%ADstulas-por-implantes-mamarios.pdf
21. Said-Lemus FM, Garza-Arriaga D, Chávez-Osorio FD, Guerra-Rendón JD. Colgajo dérmico del polo inferior de la mama para reconstrucción inmediata con materiales aloplásticos. Gac Mex Oncol [Internet]. 2018 [citado 09 Ene 2022];17:35-39. Disponible en: https://topdoctors.mx/files/Articles_Doctor/6581/GAMO_18_03_Colgajo_FM_Said_20180305_V0[1].pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright: Camagüey Medical Archive Magazine, offers immediately after being indexed in the SciELO Project; Open access to the full text of the articles under the principle of making available and free the research to promote the exchange of global knowledge and contribute to a greater extension, publication, evaluation and extensive use of the articles that can be used without purpose As long as reference is made to the primary source.
Conflicts of interest: authors must declare in a mandatory manner the presence or not of conflicts of interest in relation to the investigation presented.
(Download Statement of potential conflicts of interest)
The Revista Archivo Médico de Camagüey is under a License Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows others to distribute, to mix, to adjust and to build from its work, even for commercial purposes, as long as it is recognized the authorship of the original creation. This is the most helpful license offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials. The full license can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/
22 julio 2025