Validity and reliability of two instruments to assess adherence to treatment in burn patients
Abstract
Introduction: Therapeutic adherence constitutes one of the main problems of health interventions. One of the populations in which difficulties in adherence to treatment are evidenced is burn patients.
Objective: To determine the validity and reliability of two instruments for the evaluation of adherence to treatment and their influential dimensions in hospitalized burn patients.
Methods: From the quantitative approach, a cross-sectional study was conducted, in the period from January 2017 to December 2019. Adherence to treatment and influencing adherence to treatment were established as research variables. Expert judgment was used, the pilot test and finally the two questionnaires were applied to 90 burn patients.
Results: Both instruments proved to have content validity. The test-retest reliability of the instrument to evaluate therapeutic adherence was considerable and significant, while the internal consistency was acceptable. Reliability was very strong and consistency good in the instrument that evaluates the influencing dimensions in therapeutic adherence.
Conclusions: The two instruments developed for the evaluation of therapeutic adherence in hospitalized burn patients present content validity and reliability.
DeCS: TREATMENT ADHERENCE AND COMPLIANCE; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; BURNS; PRECIPITATING FACTORS; TECHNIQUES, MEASURES, MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT.
Downloads
References
1. Martín Alfonso LA. Adherencia al tratamiento en hipertensos de áreas de salud de nivel primario [tesis doctoral]. La Habana: Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública; 2009. Disponible en: http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/140157
2. Martín LA, Grau JA. La investigación de la adherencia terapéutica como un problema de la psicología de la salud. Psicología y Salud [Internet]. 2004 Ene-Jun [citado 17 Dic 2020];14(1):89-99. Disponible en: https://psicologiaysalud.uv.mx/index.php/psicysalud/article/view/869
3. Reyes Flores E, Trejo Álvarez R, Arguijo Abrego S, Jiménez Gómez A, Castillo Castro A, Hernández Silva A, et al. Adherencia terapéutica: conceptos, determinantes y nuevas estrategias. Rev med hondur [Internet]. 2016 Jul-Dic [citado 17 Dic 2020];84(3/4):125-32. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-882122?lang=es
4. Alvi Y, Khalique N, Ahmad A, Khan HS, Faizi N. World Health Organization Dimensions of Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy: A Study at Antiretroviral Therapy Centre, Aligarh. Indian J Community Med [Internet]. 2019 Abr-Jun [citado 10 Mar 2021];44(2):118-124. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625256/.
5. Anghel LA, Farcas AM, Oprean RN. An overview of the common methods used to measure treatment adherence. Med Pharm Rep [Internet]. 2019 Abr [citado 10 Mar 2021];92(2): 117-122. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510353/.
6. Chipana Castro K, Flores Vásquez LS. Factores asociados a la adherencia terapéutica de hemodiálisis en pacientes adultos que acuden al hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza 2018 [tesis]. Lima: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; 2018. Disponible en: https://repositorio.upch.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12866/5010/Factores_ChipanaCastro_Karen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
7. Muñoz Lopez DB, Reyes Perez V, Garay Sevilla ME, Preciado Puga MC. Validation of an instrument to measure adherence to type 2 diabetes management. Int J Clin Pharm [Internet]. 2021 [citado 10 Mar 2021];43(3):595-603. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33026588/.
8. Ortiz Suarez C. Instrumento para evaluar la adherencia a tratamientos en pacientes con factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Av enferm [Internet]. 2010 [citado 17 Dic 2020];XXVIII(2):73-87. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/aven/v28n2/v28n2a07.pdf
9. Herrera Lían A. Factores que influyen en la adherencia a tratamientos en pacientes con riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular. av enferm [Internet]. 2008 [citado 17 Dic 2020];XXVI(1):36-42. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/aven/v26n1/v26n1a04.pdf
10. Steiner D, Norman G, John Cairney. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5ª ed [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014 [citado 17 Dic 2020]. Disponible en: https://oxfordmedicine.com/view/10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001/med-9780199685219
11. Franco Fernández MA, Tello Pisco ME, Chávez Reyes JG, Barreto Zambrano IA. La complejidad en la relación médico paciente: Una mirada actual. RECIMUNDO [Internet]. 2019 Ene [citado 17 Dic 2020];3(1):90-107. Disponible en: https://www.recimundo.com/index.php/es/article/view/359
12. Naqvi AA, Hassali MA, Naqvi SBS, Shakeel S, Zia M, Fatima M, et al. Development and validation of the General Rehabilitation Adherence Scale (GRAS) in patients attending physical therapy clinics for musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders [Internet]. 2020 [citado 17 Dic 2020];21:65. Disponible en: https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12891-020-3078-y.pdf
13. Corral Y. Validez y confiabilidad de los instrumentos de investigación para la recolección de datos. Revista Ciencias de la Educación [Internet]. 2009 Ene-Jun [citado 17 Dic 2020];19(33):228-47. Disponible en: http://servicio.bc.uc.edu.ve/educacion/revista/n33/art12.pdf
14. Escobar Pérez J, Cuervo Martínez A. Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición [Internet]. 2008 Ene [citado 17 Dic 2020];6:27-36. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302438451_Validez_de_contenido_y_juicio_de_expertos_Una_aproximacion_a_su_utilizacion
15. Cruz Ramírez M, Martínez Cepena MC. Origen y desarrollo de un índice de competencia experta: el coeficiente k. Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de la Investigación Social [Internet]. 2020 [citado 10 Feb 2021];8(16):40-56. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341002000_Origen_y_desarrollo_de_un_indice_de_competencia_experta_el_coeficiente_k
16. Martín Alfonso L, Bayarre Vea HD, Grau Abalo JA. Validación del cuestionario MBG (Martín-Bayarre-Grau) para evaluar la adherencia terapéutica en hipertensión arterial. Rev cuba salud pública [Internet]. 2008 Ene-Mar [citado 17 Dic 2020];34(1). Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21420865012
17. Anastasi A. Los Tests Psicológicos [Internet]. México: Prentice Hall; 1998 [citado 17 Dic 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.bibliopsi.org/docs/carreras/obligatorias/CFG/13psicometricas/mikulic/primer%20cuatri%202020/ANASTASI%20FINAL%20TEST%20PSICOLOGICOS.pdf
18. Aiken LR. Tests psicológicos de evaluación. [Internet]. México: Prentice-Hall; 1996 [citado 17 Dic 2021]. Disponible en: https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=2LvyL8JEDmQC&printsec=frontcover&hl=es#v=onepage&q&f=false
19. Hernández Sampieri R, Fernández Collado C, Baptista Lucio MP. Metodología de la investigación. 5ª ed [Internet]. México, D.F: Mc Graw-Hill; 2010 [citado 17 Dic 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.icmujeres.gob.mx/wpcontent/uploads/2020/05/Sampieri.Met.Inv.pdf
20. García Milian AJ, Alonso Carbonell L, Suárez Lugo N, López Puig P, Rodríguez Ganem O. Validación de instrumentos para caracterizar el consumo de medicamento. Horizonte Sanitario [Internet]. 2012 Sep-Dic [citado 17 Dic 2020];11(3):7-16. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4578/457845142001.pdf
21. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
22. Martín Alfonso L. Acerca del concepto de adherencia terapéutica. Rev cuba salud pública [Internet]. 2004 Sep-Dic [citado 17 Dic 2020];30(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-34662004000400008
23. Killey J, Simons M, Kimble RM, Tyack Z. Effectiveness of interventions for optimising adherence to treatments for the prevention and management of scars: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2019 [citado 17 Dic 2020];9(3). Disponible en: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2200126894
24. Ortega Cerda JJ, Sánchez Herrera D, Rodríguez Miranda ÓA, Ortega Legaspi JM. Adherencia terapéutica: un problema de atención médica. Acta méd Grupo Ángeles [Internet]. 2018 Jul-Sep [citado 17 Dic 2020];16(3). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-72032018000300226
25. Szabo MM, Urich MA, Duncan CL, Aballay AM. Patient adherence to burn care: A systematic review of the literature. Burns [Internet]. 2016 [citado 17 Dic 2020];42:484-91. Disponible en: https://daneshyari.com/article/preview/3104123.pdf
26. Quiroz CA. Instrumento para evaluar adherencia de personas adultas a procesos de neurorehabilitación funcional basado en las dimensiones propuestas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública [Internet]. 2014 [citado 17 Dic 2020];32(1):52-61. Disponible en: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/13378
27. Chaves Torres NM, Echeverri Sarmiento JE, Ballesteros DA, Quijano Rodríguez J, Camacho D. Validación de la escala de Morisky de 8 ítems en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica. Revista Med [Internet]. 2016 [citado 17 Dic 2020];24(2). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/med/v24n2/v24n2a03.pdf
28. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Adherencia a los tratamientos a largo plazo: pruebas para la acción [Internet]. Ginebra: OMS; 2004 [citado 17 Dic 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2012/WHO-Adherence-Long-Term-Therapies-Spa-2003.pdf
29. Soria Trujano R, Vega Valero Z, Nava Quiroz C, Saavedra Vásquez K. Interacción médico paciente y su relación con el control del padecimiento en enfermos crónicos. liber [Internet]. 2011 Jul-Dic [citado 17 Dic 2020];17(2). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-48272011000200011
30. Shilbayeh SAR, Almutairi WA, Alyahya SA, Alshammari NH, Shaheen E, Adam A. Validation of knowledge and adherence assessment tools among patients on warfarin therapy in a Saudi hospital anticoagulant clinic. Int J Clin Pharm [Internet]. 2018 Feb [citado 10 Mar 2021];40(1):56-66. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11096-017-0569-5
31. Del Corral T, La Touche R, Cebriá I, Iranzo MA, Olmos R, Blanco Royano F, et al. Development and Validation of the AdT-Physio Scale: A Tool to Assess Adherence and Perception of Physical Therapist Intervention in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis. Phys Ther [Internet]. 2020 Oct [citado 10 Mar 2021];100(11):2063-74. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32754747/.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Malvin Rodriguez-Vargas, Annalié Rodríguez-Ricardo, Luis Enrique Almaguer-Mederos, Camilo Saenz-Pérez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Camagüey Medical Archive Magazine, offers immediately after being indexed in the SciELO Project; Open access to the full text of the articles under the principle of making available and free the research to promote the exchange of global knowledge and contribute to a greater extension, publication, evaluation and extensive use of the articles that can be used without purpose As long as reference is made to the primary source.
Conflicts of interest: authors must declare in a mandatory manner the presence or not of conflicts of interest in relation to the investigation presented.
(Download Statement of potential conflicts of interest)
The Revista Archivo Médico de Camagüey is under a License Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows others to distribute, to mix, to adjust and to build from its work, even for commercial purposes, as long as it is recognized the authorship of the original creation. This is the most helpful license offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials. The full license can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/
22 julio 2025